Bibliographic record
Abstract
“Enduring witness” is a 30 minute DVD produced in Australia. It traces the fictional relationship between a family practitioner (Geoff) and one of his female patients (Lisa) as she make the transition from adolescence to adulthood, through snippets from consultations about contraception, marriage, pregnancy and caring for her young children. Lisa then develops breast cancer, and we watch how Geoff manages breaking the news, assisting her with treatment, remission, relapse and palliative care. Issues relating to after care for Lisa’s family are covered at the end.Some of Geoff’s “qualities” as a doctor (empathy, openness, patient-centredness) are the very same factors which put him at risk of burn out and compassion fatigue. The story is told primarily through the eyes of the doctor, and we gain access to some of his “hidden thoughts”.The primary goal of the DVD is to promote discussion about preventing burnout and compassion fatigue which can occur from managing emotionally draining situations in clinical practice. There is further opportunity to explore issues such as breaking bad new, support for colleagues, boundary issues and surviving the ups and downs of working with people at the end of their lives.The DVD will be shown at the start of the workshop. This will then be followed by a facilitated discussion between participants. Discussion will focus on both personal responses of participants to the DVD, and also on how as practitioners we can best deal with the emotional challenges that arise in clinical practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.033 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".