A comparison of ovariectomy models for estrogen studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many estrogen-replacement studies use ovariectomized animals as controls. However, ovariectomy greatly increases body weight and can enhance the peripheral synthesis of estrogen. Tamoxifen is commonly used as an antiestrogen, but it may elicit mixed agonist or antagonist actions. The aim of our study was to compare vascular function in mesenteric arteries among groups of rats with low estradiol levels. The groups (n = 5, each) of Sprague-Dawley rats were cycling (diestrus), ovariectomized (OVX), OVX + tamoxifen (OVX-T), OVX + 4-hydroxyandrostene-3,17-dione, an aromatase inhibitor (OVX-A) to prevent peripheral synthesis of estrogen, and control-fed OVX to prevent excess weight gain. Body weight was significantly elevated in only the non-control-fed OVX group. Estrogen levels were significantly greater in the cycling rats compared with the other groups, whereas uterine weights were significantly reduced in only the OVX-A and control-fed OVX groups. Methacholine relaxation was blunted only in the OVX-A and control-fed OVX groups, suggesting a possible estrogenic influence in the non-control-fed OVX and OVX-T groups. These data indicate the potential for confounding factors to decrease the efficacy of OVX controls.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".