MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2203630503 · doi:10.1242/jeb.204.1.115

Cardiovascular Effects of Hypercarbia in Rainbow Trout (<i>Oncorhynchus Mykiss</i>): A Role for Externally Oriented Chemoreceptors

2001· article· en· W2203630503 on OpenAlexaff
J. E. Mckendry, Steve F. Perry

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Biology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPhysiological and biochemical adaptations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypercarbiaInternal medicineEndocrinologyVascular resistanceChemistryAcetazolamideVasodilationCardiac outputRainbow troutBlood pressureAcidosisAnesthesiaMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In situ and in vivo experiments were performed on rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) to examine (i) the direct effect of CO(2) on the systemic vasculature and (ii) the influence of internal versus external hypercapnic acidosis on cardiovascular variables including blood pressure, cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance. Results from in situ saline-perfused trunk preparations indicated that CO(2) (0.6, 1.0 or 2.0% CO(2)) elicited a significant vasodilation, but only in the presence of pre-existing humoral adrenergic tone. In the absence of pre-existing vascular tone, CO(2) was without effect on systemic resistance. In contrast, hypercarbia in vivo triggered a statistically significant increase in systemic resistance (approximately 70 %) that was associated with elevated ventral aortic (approximately 42 %) and dorsal aortic (approximately 43 %) blood pressures and with a significant bradycardia (approximately 12 %); cardiac output was not significantly affected. To determine the potential roles of internal versus external chemoreceptors in mediating the cardiovascular responses to hypercarbia, experiments were performed to elevate the endogenous arterial partial pressure of CO(2) (Pa(CO2)) without an accompanying increase in external P(CO2) (Pw(CO2)). In one series, trout were given a bolus injection of the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor acetazolamide (30 mg kg(-1)) to inhibit CO(2) excretion, and thus raise Pa(CO2), 5-7 h prior to being exposed to an acute increase in Pw(CO2) (maximum Pw(CO2)=6.3+/-0.4 mmHg; 1 mmHg=0.133 kPa). Despite a marked increase in Pa(CO2) (approximately 7 mmHg) after injection of acetazolamide, there was no increase in dorsal aortic blood pressure (P(DA)) or systemic resistance (R(S)). The ensuing exposure to hypercarbia, however, significantly increased P(DA) (by approximately 20 %) and R(S) (by approximately 35 %). A second series of experiments used a 5-7 h period of exposure to hyperoxia (Pw(O2)=643+/-16 mmHg) to establish a new, elevated baseline Pa(CO2) (7.8+/-1.1 mmHg) without any change in Pw(CO2). Despite a steadily increasing Pa(CO2) during the 5-7 h of hyperoxia, there was no associated increase in P(DA) or R(S). Ensuing exposure to hypercarbia, however, significantly increased P(DA) (by approximately 20 %) and R(S) (by approximately 150 %). Plasma adrenaline levels were increased significantly during exposure to hypercarbia and, therefore, probably contributed to the accompanying cardiovascular effects. These findings demonstrate that the cardiovascular effects associated with hypercarbia in rainbow trout are unrelated to any direct constrictory effects of CO(2) on the systemic vasculature and are unlikely to be triggered by activation of internally oriented receptors. Instead, the data suggest that the cardiovascular responses associated with hypercarbia are mediated exclusively by externally oriented chemoreceptors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental BiologySame topicPhysiological and biochemical adaptationsFrench-language works237,207