Dorsal root entry zone coagulation for treatment of deafferentation pain syndromes.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Deafferentation pain is a kind of chronic pain syndrome and hard to manipulate. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of junctional dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) coagulation, 23 consecutive patients with intractable deafferentation pain syndrome were studied. METHODS: Twenty-three patients underwent junctional DREZ coagulation (C5-T1 for upper extremities and L2-S1 for lower extremities) under general anesthesia. The pain severity was evaluated by the short McGill pain questionnaire (MPQ) and the visual analog scale (VAS), and the depression and anxiety of patients were assessed by Hamilton rating scale for depression (HRSD), Hamilton anxiety scale (HAMA), self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS). RESULTS: All the patients experienced significant pain reduction immediately after surgery. The scales of short MPQ and VAS at pre-operation, 6-month and 12-month follow-up were 31.5 +/- 3.4 and 8.8 +/- 1.5, 6.5 +/- 1.9 and 2.5 +/- 2.2, 7.1 +/- 2.1 and 2.9 +/- 1.9, respectively. The postoperative scores comparing to pre-operative scores showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.01). The depression and anxiety state was also significantly relieved. At 12-month follow-up 6 patients had complete pain relief, 11 had excellent results with more than 75% pain relief, 17 had good results with more than 50% pain relief (73.9%). The main postoperative complications were transient slight hemiplegia (8), hypesthesia and paresthesia (15), a bearing down feeling of affected extremity (6), and deep sensory disability in the lower limbs (4) on the operated side. Because of the long time and prone position of the operation, 13 cases had a transient hyperalgesia in the upper chest. CONCLUSION: DREZ coagulation is a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of deafferentation pain syndromes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".