MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2204089819

Did Shakespeare Visit Italy

2014· article· en· W2204089819 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ros Barber

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetryArt historyPerformance artHistoryReading (process)ArtAmerican poetryClassicsLiteraturePhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Featured in this issue: Fiction New short stories, 'Downstream the Water Darkens' by David Frankel and 'A Question of Desire' by Michael Humfrey. Poetry From a range of poets including Suad Ali, Emily Bilman, John F. Deane, Pavol Janik, Yahia Lababidi, and Patricia McCarthy. Essays Peter Abbs, the Emeritus Professor of Creative Writing at Sussex University on William Blake and the Forging of the Self. Suzi Feay, the former Literary Editor of the Independent writes on her experience of re-reading the novels of Leon Garfield after enjoying them as a child. Edward Lucie-Smith's fascinating research into his family ancestry and on being a child of World War I. Holly Luhning, a young Canadian novelist describes what London means to her in the sixth of the 'My London' series. Jeffrey Meyers identifies the man who raped Sylvia Plath. Tony Roberts on Edmund Wilson and Sir Isaiah Berlin. Reviews Belinda Cooke reviews recent poetry collections: Roisin Tierney's The Spanish-Italian Border, Ciaran Berry's The Dead Zoo and Derek Mahon's Echo's Grove: Collected Translations. Geoffrey Heptonstall reviews new poetry collections by John Burnside and Toby Martinez de las Rivas Terry Kelly on Hugo William's career as well as his latest poetry collection: I Knew the Bride Steven Matthews on August Kleinzahler and Frederick Seidel Derwent May on How to Open an Art Gallery Michael Thomas on two books on the Great War by Margaret MacMillan and Pete Ayrton

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.187
Threshold uncertainty score0.627

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1870.083

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismFrench-language works237,207