Time, History and Typology in John Donne’s <i> Pseudo-Martyr</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In his first major published work, Pseudo-Martyr of 1610, John Donne's main interest was to develop a working idea of the Christian Church as a temporal phenomenon.^Hewas not so much interested in the Church as an organization in our sense of the word as structure and management Rather, he was interested in it as an institution that approximated as much as possible the divine intentions of a God for his people when, scattered over the face of the earth at different times and in different epochs, they congregated together in a social structure to keep his word fully aUve.Donne's Pseudo-Martyr, therefore, was an immensely public work by a profoundly private man, touching on one of the central issues dominating the religio- political thought of his times.In the work, Donne sought to devise for him- self and for his readers, both Catholic and Protestant, a viable idea of the church as a temporal thing.How, in time, P^ewJo-A/aArvr asks, did the Lord take onto himselfthe trappings of an organization?Moreover, it was not so much the trappings in the shape of broad lines and details that interested Donne; rather, he was concerned with the manner in which the Lord transferred himself out of his individual person in the realm of eternity into his likeness of a Christian collectivity in the dimension of time.Written only four years after the Gunpowder Plot to blowup the Houses of Parliament with everybody in them (1605), Pseudo-Martyr was a work supposedly inspired by James I's writings.^Ostensibly,it was meant to attempt to convince Roman Catholics that they could take the Oath of Allegiance to James as a temporal ruler, without betraying their loyalty to the spiritual authority of the popes.It was also written by a witty, probably not easily lovable, middle-aged ex-Catholic of confused, limited reputation.This man had been jailed nine years earlier because he dared to marry secretly the wrong woman for love.^Inaddition Pseudo-Martyr was written by an author who had so far composed two books only for himself, one on suicide and the other on the despicable character of courtiers."*He had not yet published anything except two insignificant prefatory poems in the
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.024 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".