MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2204753321 · doi:10.1149/06906.0079ecst

Combined Surface-Activated Bonding Technique for Low-Temperature Cu/SiO<sub>2</sub> Hybrid Bonding

2015· article· en· W2204753321 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D IC and TSV technologies
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnodic bondingDirect bondingChemisorptionMaterials scienceWafer bondingWaferThermocompression bondingIonBond energyComposite materialChemistryAdsorptionNanotechnologyLayer (electronics)MoleculePhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work develops a combined surface-activated bonding (SAB) technique for low-temperature SiO 2 -SiO 2 and Cu-Cu bonding at 200 °C. The combined SAB technique involves combinations of surface activation by using surface bombardment by neutralized Ar ion beam containing Si atoms, water vapor exposure, and prebonding attach/detach prior to wafer bonding in vacuum. Bonding strength close to Si bulk fracture energy was achieved for both SiO 2 -SiO 2 and Cu-Cu bonding pairs. We suggest the enhanced –OH (both Si–OH and Cu–OH) chemisorption on the wafers and pre-bonding removal of excess H 2 O from the interface/surfaces are the key factors involved in the present low-temperature bonding technique. This technique is promising for 3D integration through Cu/SiO 2 hybrid bonding at no more than 200 °C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it