MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2205132725

Theoretical Research On Specific Human Resources In Tourism. Features In Romania

2014· article· en· W2205132725 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carmen Cristina Albu, Dan Constantin Vărzaru

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of University of Craiova - Economic Sciences Series · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicHospitality and Tourism Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismVocational educationGovernment (linguistics)Human resourcesBusinessEconomic shortageMarketingPublic relationsEconomic growthPolitical scienceEconomicsManagement
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tourism is a sector of the economy in which the problems related to the jobs and necessary skills to exit the crisis are emphasized more sensitive than other sectors of the economy. This paper proposes a literature review based on the latest studies and research literature worldwide (USA, Canada, EU, etc.) and aims to identify the factors and trends influencing skill shortages in tourism and also the policies to mitigate this deficit. Tourism feels the chronic global shortage of human resources due to its seasonal activity and its lower efficiency. Most relied upon solutions are considering closer involvement of the Government in tourism support. An important role lies in defining the content engine training and education. The differences between the requirements of the tourism sector and content of vocational, technical and university learning is a problem in many countries. The situation remedy requires programme rethinking, teachers improving skills, creating practical programmes in terms of quality, preference in enterprises and establishment of the most appropriate bridge linking vocational (professional) education and higher education to open students’ clear and open opportunities. The paper lists the types of partnerships between public powers, the tourism sector and the educational sector at a global level and highlights their potential in connection with national and cultural specifics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of University of Craiova - Economic Sciences SeriesSame topicHospitality and Tourism EducationFrench-language works237,207