MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2205163729

The behaviour of some peach cultivars pertaining to the peach world collection in pedoclimatic conditions of Timisoara area.

2014· article· en· W2205163729 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
O. A. Iordănescu, A. Costea

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Papers - Series B, Horticulture · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCultivarTemperate climateHorticultureGeographyBiologyBotany
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peach represents one of the most appreciated fruit tree variety of the temperate climate, which in the last 30 years has benefited of a special attention, fact that has led to the expansion of cultivated areas with this variety and to diversification of the assortment. Researches carried out in USA, Canada, France, Italy, Spain, even in our country had led to obtaining a large number of varieties with remarkable agro-productive characteristics. In the present work were studied 9 cultivars of peach pertaining to the Peach and Nectarine World Collection introduced and multiplied in Romania by Acad. Dr. Vasile Cociu. The cultivars originating from all continents have been planted in Timisoara in 2007 with the purpose of being tested in culture and naturalizing in Romania of some new foreign varieties. Regarding the fruit weight were evidenced 'Yinquing', 'Giala di Roma', 'Tardiva', 'Eureka' and 'Piros Magdalena'. In terms of % kernel were highlighted 'Giala di Roma Tardiva', 'Marqueen' and 'Gold Dust' cultivars with less than 7% kernel %. Concerning dry substances, the highest sugar content was registered in the fruits of following cultivars: 'Marqueen', 'Eureka', 'Yinquing' and 'Giala di Roma Tardiva'.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific Papers - Series B, HorticultureSame topicPlant Physiology and Cultivation StudiesFrench-language works237,207