MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2205915525 · doi:10.1071/rdv28n2ab86

86 IMPROVED BOVINE EMBRYO PRODUCTION USING NOVEL IN VITRO CULTURE SYSTEMS

2015· article· en· W2205915525 on OpenAlexaff
J. H. Pryor, J.F. Hasler, Lotte Strøbech, B. Avery, Nesrein M. Hashem, S. Menges, Charles R. Long, G. Shewfelt, C.R. Looney

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsVétoquinol (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmbryo cultureIn vitro maturationTheriogenologyAndrologyFetal bovine serumReproductive technologyChemistryBiologyEmbryoIn vitroBiotechnologyOocyteCryopreservationMedicineBiochemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Development and testing of new embryo production components is important to improve the outcome following in vitro production of bovine embryos. The objective of this study was to compare media used in two bovine embryo production systems (control and EmbryoTrans Biotech: ETB). In Exp. 1, abattoir-derived cumulus-oocyte complexes were randomly assigned and in vitro matured (IVM) in either control [Medium 199 with Earles salts (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone, Logan, UT, USA), 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen), 0.2 mM sodium pyruvate, 2 mM L-glutamine (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), and 5.0 µg mL–1 of Folltropin®-V (Vetoquinol, Pullman, WA, USA)] or ETB BO-IVM medium for 21 to 24 h. IVF was conducted in 500 µL of pre-equilibrated modified Tyrode-lactate medium for control (Pryor et al. 2011 Theriogenology 75, 24–33) or ETB BO-IVF in Nunclon® 4-well multi-dishes (VWR Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Seventeen hours post-insemination, presumptive zygotes were cleaned of cumulus cells and cultured in either Bovine Evolve (Zenith Biotech, Guilford, CT, USA) supplemented with 4 mg mL–1 of Probumin BSA (EMD Millipore, Norcross, GA, USA), under oil (Irvine Scientific, Santa Ana, CA, USA) or ETB BO-IVC medium under BO-oil for 7 days (8 days post-IVF). All cultures were performed at 38.5°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2, 5% O2, and 90% N2 using BT37 incubators (Planer Plc, Sunbury, UK). For Exp. 2, all conditions were maintained except a modified ETB BO-IVCA medium was used. On Day 8 of IVC, grade 1 and 2 blastocysts (BL) through hatching blastocysts (HBL) were counted and used to calculate total viable rates. In Exp. 2, these embryos were fixed in cold methanol, washed in PBS/0.1% Tween 20, mounted in 10 µg mL–1 Hoechst 33342/glycerol, and viewed under UV light to count cells (n = 49 and 107 for control and ETB, respectively). Each experiment was replicated 3 times with a total of 425 oocytes in Exp. 1 and 430 in Exp. 2, divided equally between treatments. Percentage data were transformed using arcsine square root function before analysis and means compared using a paired Student’s t-test. For Exp. 1, there were no differences in rates of cleavage or viable embryos between control and ETB systems (81.3% and 42.9% v. 80.5% and 48.4%, respectively). In Exp. 2, ETB was superior to control for percent viable, HBL, and combined HBL/expanded BL (51.9, 23.9, 45.8% v. 29.2, 5.8, 20.5, respectively; P < 0.05). Differences between mean cell counts for viable embryos were significant (control = 127.0 ± 6.7 s.e.m. and ETB = 162.7 ± 5.7; P < 0.0001). Embryo viability decreased in control media between Exp. 1 and 2 (42.9 v. 29.2%; P < 0.05). Seasonal differences may have contributed via heat stress with temperatures ranging from 23.8°C for Exp. 1 to 33.8°C for Exp. 2. Interestingly, embryo development in the ETB media did not decrease under the same conditions. In conclusion, ETB media produced more high-quality embryos than control under varying conditions experienced by commercial IVF companies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.752
Threshold uncertainty score0.834

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207