Role of vagal C-fiber afferents in the bronchomotor response to lactic acid in the newborn dog
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We addressed the hypothesis that vagal C-fiber afferents and cyclooxygenase products are the mechanisms responsible for lactic acid (LA)-induced bronchoconstriction in the newborn dog. Perineural capsaicin and indomethacin were used to block conduction of vagal C fibers and production of cyclooxygenase products, respectively. Perineural capsaicin eliminated (85%) the increase in lung resistance (RL; 45 +/- 5.6%) due to capsaicin (25 microg/kg), whereas the increase in RL (54 +/- 6.9%) due to LA (0.4 mmol/kg) was only inhibited by 37 +/- 4.7% (P < 0.05). Atropine reduced LA-induced bronchoconstriction (42 +/- 2.1%) by an amount similar to that obtained with perineural capsaicin. However, inhibition was significantly increased when atropine was combined with indomethacin (61 +/- 2.7%; P < 0.05), implicating cyclooxygenase products in the LA-induced bronchoconstrictor response. We conclude that the mechanisms responsible for LA-induced bronchoconstriction in the newborn are 1) activation of vagal C-fibers, which, through projections to medullary respiratory centers, leads to activation of vagal cholinergic efferents; 2) production of cyclooxygenase products, which cause bronchoconstriction independent of medullary involvement; and 3) an unknown bronchoconstrictor mechanism, putatively tachykinin mediated. On the basis of our data, pharmaceutical targeting of pulmonary afferents would prevent multiple downstream mechanisms that lead to airway narrowing due to inflammatory lung disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".