122 TIMED ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION IN WOOD BISON USING FROZEN-THAWED SEMEN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent progress with methods to control ovulation and semen cryopreservation in Wood Bison was the impetus to test the feasibility of timed AI to facilitate reclamation of this threatened species. A 2 × 2 design was used to compare the efficacy of 2 ovulation synchronization techniques and 2 semen cryopreservation protocols. Female Wood Bison were assigned randomly to 2 groups (n = 24/group) in which ovarian synchronization was induced by ultrasound-guided ablation of follicles >5 mm or intramuscular treatment with 2.5 mg of estradiol 17B + 50 mg of progesterone (E+P) in canola oil. A progesterone-releasing intravaginal device (PRID) was placed at the time of follicle ablation (for 5 days) or E+P treatment (for 8 days) in the respective groups. A luteolytic dose of prostaglandin was given at the time of PRID removal, and 2500 IU of hCG was given IM 3 days later. Bison were inseminated 24 and 36 h after hCG treatment using frozen-thawed semen. The semen was collected by electro-ejaculation from 4 Wood Bison bulls, pooled, and divided into aliquots diluted in either egg-yolk extender (EY) or cholesterol-loaded cyclodextrin extender (CLC). Half the bison in each synchronization group were inseminated with either EY- or CLC-extended semen. Bison were examined by ultrasonography every 12 h beginning on the day of hCG treatment for 3 days or until ovulation was detected, whichever occurred first. Pregnancy diagnosis was made by ultrasonography 34–36 days after insemination. Two bison were excluded during the experiment because of handling difficulty; therefore, the total number of bison used was 46. Ovulation rate and interval to ovulation were compared between synchronization groups by chi-square and t-test, respectively. Pregnancy rates were compared among groups by 2-way ANOVA after transforming data to arcsin. The ovulation rate was not different between synchronization groups [combined mean, 37/46 (80%)], nor was the degree of synchrony, as assessed by the residuals (variation from the mean) in the respective groups. However, the diameter (mean ± standard error of the mean) of the dominant follicle at the time of hCG treatment was smaller in the follicle ablation group than in the E+P group (10.5 ± 0.6 v. 13.9 ± 0.6; P < 0.04), and the interval from hCG treatment to ovulation tended to be longer (35.3 ± 1.6 v. 31.8 ± 1.3 h; P = 0.10). Pregnancy rate was not affected by synchronization procedure, but pregnancy was detected only in the EY-inseminated group (9/23 v. 0/23; P < 0.01). Despite that post-thaw sperm motility was similar for EY and CLC semen (41.7 ± 2.9 and 44.6 ± 3.3%; respectively), CLC-treated semen failed to impregnate bison in vivo. We concluded that synchronization and timed insemination with frozen-thawed semen is feasible in Wood Bison. Of the 23 bison inseminated with EY-extended semen, 21 ovulated (91%), and of those that ovulated 9 became pregnant (43%). Both synchronization schemes were effective, but the ablation protocol may be improved by an additional day between ablation and hCG treatment. We thank Vetoquinol Canada and Merck Animal Health for providing hormone treatments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".