The Heart of a Stranger: Voluntary Work and European Settlement in Colonial Kenya
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper examines the culture of voluntary social welfare work in twentieth century settler society in Kenya as an aspect of the history of ideas of active citizenship and civil society between Global North and South. After the First World War, significant numbers of British women settled with their families in the ‘White Highlands’ of Kenya. Many participated in organized and individual voluntary welfare work as a part of daily life: ‘do-good’ activity performed in an attempt both to benefit neighbors and to create space for themselves as strangers in a new environment. Made possible through the movement of people and ideas within the hierarchies of power and privilege constructed by imperial rule, voluntary activity by white women in colonial Africa could not, as the women themselves supposed, be apolitical. Rather, it was integral to British imperial governance through the construction and operation of colonial difference—in this case through notions of responsibility for social welfare and the appropriate contribution of women in the public sphere. An aspect of the cultural history of the European diaspora in sub-Saharan Africa, this discussion of voluntary work in Kenya also has ongoing implications for perceptions of difference in civil society and social welfare services between Global North and South, as articulated in contemporary international development discourse and practice. Archival sources used in this study include the private archive of the East Africa Women’s League, a dominant colonial voluntary organization in Kenya, as well from the Kenya National Archive and The National Archives, Kew.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.023 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".