MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2206903933 · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-1853

Combined Antitumor Therapy with Metronomic Topotecan and Hypoxia-Activated Prodrug, Evofosfamide, in Neuroblastoma and Rhabdomyosarcoma Preclinical Models

2015· article· en· W2206903933 on OpenAlexaff
Libo Zhang, Paula Marrano, Bing Wu, Sushil Kumar, Paul S. Thorner, Sylvain Baruchel

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTopotecanNeuroblastomaRhabdomyosarcomaCancer researchMedicineIn vivoPharmacologyChemotherapyCell cultureInternal medicineSarcomaBiologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Tumor cells residing in tumor hypoxic zones are a major cause of drug resistance and tumor relapse. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of evofosfamide, a hypoxia-activated prodrug, and its combination with topotecan in neuroblastoma and rhabdomyosarcoma preclinical models. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Neuroblastoma and rhabdomyosarcoma cells were tested in vitro to assess the effect of evofosfamide on cell proliferation, both as a single agent and in combination with topotecan. In vivo antitumor activity was evaluated in different xenograft models. Animal survival was studied with the neuroblastoma metastatic tumor model. RESULTS: All tested cell lines showed response to evofosfamide under normoxic conditions, but when exposed to hypoxia overnight, a 2- to 65-fold decrease of IC50 was observed. Adding topotecan to the evofosfamide treatment significantly increased cytotoxicity in vitro In neuroblastoma xenograft models, single-agent evofosfamide treatment delayed tumor growth. Complete tumor regression was observed in the combined topotecan/evofosfamide treatment group after 2-week treatment. Combined treatment also improved survival in a neuroblastoma metastatic model, compared to single-agent treatments. In rhabdomyosarcoma xenograft models, combined treatment was more effective than single agents. We also showed that evofosfamide mostly targeted tumor cells within hypoxic regions while topotecan was more effective to tumor cells in normoxic regions. Combined treatment induced tumor cell apoptosis in both normoxic and hypoxic regions. CONCLUSIONS: Evofosfamide shows antitumor effects in neuroblastoma and rhabdomyosarcoma xenografts. Compared with single-agent, evofosfamide/topotecan, combined therapy improves tumor response, delays tumor relapse, and enhances animal survival in preclinical tumor models. Clin Cancer Res; 22(11); 2697-708. ©2015 AACR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.188
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicCancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207