“Beggaring the Nation”: Bodily Inscription and the Body Politic in Rohinton Mistry’s A Fine Balance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Rohinton Mistry’s novel A Fine Balance (1995), the ubiquity of bodily metaphor and description reveals a fundamental concern with the representational capacity of the body. Set in India and focussing primarily on the volatile period of the Emergency (1975-1977), the novel explores the way in which historical and political processes impinge upon the lives of, and inscribe the bodies of, individual citizens. In addition to providing a structural paradigm by charting the progression of the narrative, images of bodily decline, deterioration, and mutilation serve as signifiers of the violent regulatory practices of both the caste-system and the Indira Gandhi regime during the Emergency. Within a theoretical framework informed by the work of Michel Foucault, Julia Kristeva, and others, the regulatory practices of the state in A Fine Balance can be understood to produce not only docile bodies that are useful and obedient, but also abject bodies that disturb the coherence and stability of a social structure depicted as a healthy and pure body. Mistry’s representations of the body as an inscriptive surface thus problematize the attempts of the novel’s ruling Indira Gandhi regime to depict the Indian body politic as a coherent, homogenous, and corporeal totality. Ultimately, A Fine Balance suggests that it is only through an awareness of the diffuse interrelationships between individual subjects that we can begin to imagine the complex and heterogeneous network of linkages of which the nation is comprised.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".