MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2207634955 · doi:10.1115/imece2014-37051

Measurement of Local Mass Transfer Distribution in a Large Diameter S-Bend at High Reynolds Number

2014· article· en· W2207634955 on OpenAlexafffund
D. Wang, D. Ewing, T. Le, C.Y. Ching

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicErosion and Abrasive Machining
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCANDU Owners Group
KeywordsReynolds numberMass transferMaterials scienceRADIUSMechanicsDissolutionInletFlow (mathematics)TurbulenceComposite materialPhysicsChemistryMechanical engineeringEngineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The local mass transfer in a 203mm diameter back to back bend arranged in a S-configuration was measured at a Reynolds number of 300,000. A dissolving wall method using gypsum dissolution to water at 40°C was used, with a Schmidt number of 660. The experiment was performed in a flow loop by flowing water through the test section. The topography of the unworn and the worn inner surface was quantified using nondestructive X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) scans. The two scanned surfaces were aligned to a common coordinate system using commercial software and in-house routines. The local mass transfer rate was obtained from the local change in radius over the flow time. Two regions of high mass transfer were present: (i) along the intrados of the first bend near the inlet and (ii) at the exit of the extrados of the first bend that extends to the intrados of the second bend. The latter was the region of highest mass transfer in the S-bend.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.258
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicErosion and Abrasive MachiningFrench-language works237,207