Effect of Embedded Lead Shot on Body Condition of Common Eiders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During waterfowl hunting a large number of birds are shot but not instantly killed. Some will die within a few days as a direct consequence of heavy injuries, whereas another proportion is only lightly injured and will survive for an extended period of time although their survival may still be affected. We predicted that embedded body shot (when not instantly lethal) will cause reduced body condition among common eiders (Somateria mollissima), as we assumed such birds to be physical disadvantaged (e.g., as to mobility and foraging) from their injuries. Among birds collected during 3 winters (2000–2002) by Inuit hunters and fishermen in Nuuk, southwest Greenland, we X-rayed and dissected 762 common eiders to extract information about embedded lead shot and body condition. After adjusting for structural body size, year and date of sampling, habitat, and sampling method, we found that embedded lead shot had a significant effect on juvenile body condition. Wounded juvenile birds carried on average 19% less fat than unwounded juveniles. In accordance with a priori predictions, we did not detect an impact of wounding on the body condition of immature and adult birds. For most of these older birds, the shooting incidence took place >1 year before they were collected, and the insignificant test results indicated the absence of a long-term effect on body condition once birds survived the initial effect of wounding. For juvenile birds, the wounding effect most likely added to other causes of mortality; however, additional knowledge about natural mortality is required to estimate the net consequence on population dynamic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".