MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2208632078 · doi:10.1021/acssensors.5b00147

G-Quadruplex DNA for Fluorescent and Colorimetric Detection of Thallium(I)

2015· article· en· W2208632078 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael Hoang, Po‐Jung Jimmy Huang, Juewen Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Sensors · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science
KeywordsDetection limitFörster resonance energy transferThalliumChemistryFluorescenceFluorophoreBiosensorDeoxyribozymeColloidal goldDNANanoparticleMercury (programming language)Analytical Chemistry (journal)Nuclear chemistryInorganic chemistryNanotechnologyMaterials scienceChromatographyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thallium is a highly toxic heavy metal, but its sensing is underexplored compared to its neighboring elements in the periodic table: lead and mercury. Thallium has two oxidation states. A DNAzyme-based biosensor for Tl 3+ was reported recently, representing the first work in this area. However, the most environmentally abundant thallium is monovalent Tl +, which is the focus of this work. Since Tl + is similar to K + in terms of size and charge, G-quadruplex DNAs are herein tested for Tl + detection. First, nine dual fluorophore labeled DNA probes are screened. Among them, a DNA designated PS2.M has the largest increase in fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) efficiency upon Tl + addition. This FRET-based assay is directly used as a biosensor yielding a detection limit of 59 μM Tl + . In comparison, K + had a much lower response and the other tested monovalent metals do not produce a significant signal increase. In addition, a colorimetric sensor was developed based on DNA protected gold nanoparticles. When folded by Tl +, the nonlabeled PS2.M DNA cannot effectively adsorb onto gold nanoparticles. This leads to a color change from red to blue upon salt addition. The detection limit is 4.6 μM Tl +, and Tl + spiked in a lake water sample can also be detected. CD spectroscopy is used to further understand Tl + binding to PS2.M. This study demonstrates that DNA can also be used for detecting Tl +, and this work gives rise to a highly effective probe for this purpose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations73
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS SensorsSame topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniquesFrench-language works237,207