Differential‐fed UWB antenna with dual band‐notched characteristics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT In this letter, a differential‐fed ultrawideband (UWB) antenna with dual band‐notched characteristics is proposed. The proposed antenna mainly consists of two UWB rectangular ring monopole antennas which are placed face‐to‐face and a square ground plane with a modified square slot. To avoid the electromagnetic interference within the UWB band, a C‐shaped stub connected with the ring monopole is adopted to reject 3.5‐GHz WiMAX while an inverted‐Ω shaped slot embedded in the monopole antenna is used to filter 5.5‐GHz WLAN. A prototype of the antenna with the optimized parameters is fabricated and tested. Measured results show that the 10‐dB impedance bandwidth is from 2.53 to more than 11 GHz, along with dual notched bands of 3.27–4.13 and 4.95–6.28 GHz. In addition, the antenna has good radiation patterns and stable gain in the whole operating band. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 58:351–355, 2016
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".