MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2209372662 · doi:10.1139/cjes-2014-0180

Macroflora, paleogeography, and paleoecology of the Upper Cretaceous (Turonian?–Santonian) Saanich Member of the Comox Formation, Saanich Peninsula, British Columbia, Canada

2015· article· en· W2209372662 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Carl H. W. Jonsson, Richard J. Hebda

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Diversity and Evolution
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaRoyal British Columbia Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyCretaceousPaleontologyPaleoecologyMacrofossilSedimentary rockFluvialBiostratigraphyStratigraphic unitStructural basinHolocene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Morphotypes of plant macrofossil assemblages of the basal unit of the Upper Cretaceous (Turonian?–Santonian) Comox Formation, Nanaimo Group, Vancouver Island, were investigated to provide insight into the character of the macroflora, environment of deposition, and paleogeography of Vancouver Island. Three floristic assemblages were documented: one dominated by angiosperm morphotypes such as Platanus, Menispermites, and Zizyphus-like leaves; another dominated by gymnosperm morphotypes such as those synonymous with Glyptostrobus comoxensis Bell and Pseudoctenis latipennis (Heer) Seward; and a third assemblage transitional between the previous two. These assemblages suggest the Saanich Member was likely deposited in a barrier island – estuarine floodplain complex with fluvial sedimentary input. The macrofloral assemblage also includes many endemic taxa, suggesting a barrier to floral migration between the paleocontinent and the Vancouver Island precursor during the Upper Cretaceous, which supports the existence of a third floristic province in North America during the Upper Cretaceous.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.219
Threshold uncertainty score0.447

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.168
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth SciencesSame topicPlant Diversity and EvolutionFrench-language works237,207