Independent Proteolytic Activities Control the Stability and Size of <b><i>Drosophila </i></b>Inhibitor of Apoptosis 2 Protein
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Drosophila immune deficiency pathway defends many bacterial pathogens and bears striking molecular similarities to the mammalian tumor necrosis factor signal transduction pathway. Orthologous inhibitors of apoptosis ubiquitin ligases act at a proximal stage of both responses to coordinate the assembly of signal transduction platforms that shape host immune responses. Despite the importance of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins within evolutionarily conserved innate immune responses, we know relatively little about the cellular machinery that controls inhibitor of apoptosis activity. In this study, we examined the molecular basis for inhibitor of apoptosis 2 protein regulation in the immune deficiency pathway. Our studies identified two distinct proteolytic events that determine the stability and composition of cellular inhibitor of apoptosis 2 protein pools. We found that apoptotic caspase activity cleaves inhibitor of apoptosis 2 at an N-terminal aspartate to generate a truncated protein that retains the ability to interact with immune deficiency pathway members. We also showed that a C-terminal ubiquitin ligase activity within inhibitor of apoptosis 2 directs the proteasomal destruction of full-length and truncated inhibitor of apoptosis 2 isoforms. These studies add to our appreciation of the regulation of innate immunity and suggest potential links between apoptotic caspases and innate defenses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".