How research and evidence-based analysis can shape Veterans’ public policy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CARACTÈRE OFFICIEL DES CODIFICATIONSSubsections 31(1) and (2) of the Legislation Revision and Consolidation Act, in force on June 1, 2009, provide as follows:Les paragraphes 31(1) et (2) de la Loi sur la révision et la codification des textes législatifs, en vigueur le 1 er juin 2009, prévoient ce qui suit : Published consolidation is evidenceCodifications comme élément de preuve 31 (1) Every copy of a consolidated statute or consolidated regulation published by the Minister under this Act in either print or electronic form is evidence of that statute or regulation and of its contents and every copy purporting to be published by the Minister is deemed to be so published, unless the contrary is shown. (1)Tout exemplaire d'une loi codifiée ou d'un règlement codifié, publié par le ministre en vertu de la présente loi sur support papier ou sur support électronique, fait foi de cette loi ou de ce règlement et de son contenu.Tout exemplaire donné comme publié par le ministre est réputé avoir été ainsi publié, sauf preuve contraire. Inconsistencies in Acts Incompatibilité -lois(2) In the event of an inconsistency between a consolidated statute published by the Minister under this Act and the original statute or a subsequent amendment as certified by the Clerk of the Parliaments under the Publication of Statutes Act, the original statute or amendment prevails to the extent of the inconsistency.(2) Les dispositions de la loi d'origine avec ses modifications subséquentes par le greffier des Parlements en vertu de la Loi sur la publication des lois l'emportent sur les dispositions incompatibles de la loi codifiée publiée par le ministre en vertu de la présente loi. LAYOUTThe notes that appeared in the left or right margins are now in boldface text directly above the provisions to which they relate.They form no part of the enactment, but are inserted for convenience of reference only. MISE EN PAGELes notes apparaissant auparavant dans les marges de droite ou de gauche se retrouvent maintenant en caractères gras juste au-dessus de la disposition à laquelle elles se rattachent.Elles ne font pas partie du texte, n'y figurant qu'à titre de repère ou d'information. NOTE NOTEThis consolidation is current to June 21, 2023.The last amendments came into force on July 27, 2020.Any amendments that were not in force as of June 21, 2023 are set out at the end of this document under the heading "Amendments Not in Force".Cette codification est à jour au 21 juin 2023.Les dernières modifications sont entrées en vigueur le 27 juillet 2020.Toutes modifications qui n'étaient pas en vigueur au 21 juin 2023 sont énoncées à la fin de ce document sous le titre « Modifications non en vigueur ».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.273 | 0.351 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.031 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.046 | 0.032 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.022 |
| Research integrity | 0.019 | 0.019 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".