MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2210236393 · doi:10.1161/circ.129.suppl_1.p032

Abstract P032: Adiponectin is Significantly Associated with NT-pro BNP Levels: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

2014· article· en· W2210236393 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew Allison, Michael H. Criqui, Lori B. Daniels, Alan S. Maisel, J.M. Polak, Mary Cushman

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsMount Allison University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdiponectinMedicineAdipokineInternal medicineLeptinEndocrinologyQuartileAldosteroneBody mass indexCardiologyObesityConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Increasing adiposity results in an increase in intravascular volume, while natriuretic peptides increase in response to pressure and volume overload. Adiponectin and leptin are cytokines released from adipose tissue (adipokines) that have purportedly opposite associations with CVD and measures of left ventricular structure and function. Methods: Subjects were 1970 individuals enrolled in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis who were without clinical CVD at baseline and evaluated by extensive survey information, relevant physical measurements and fasting venous blood that was analyzed for NT-pro BNP (proBNP) and the adipokines adiponectin and leptin. proBNP was assayed from two different study visits about 4 years apart. Results: At baseline, the mean age was 64.8 years and 48% were female. Forty-two percent were White, 26% Hispanic American, 18% African American and 14% Chinese American. Median values for adiponectin, leptin and proBNP were 17.3 μg/ml, 13.1 ng/ml and 66.7 pg/ml, respectively, while the median change in proBNP was 11.6 pg/ml. With adjustment for traditional CVD risk factors, adiposity, renin, aldosterone and LV mass and volume, a 1-SD increment in adiponectin was associated with a 13.7 pg/ml higher proBNP level (p < 0.01), while, compared to the 1st quartile of adiponectin, the 2nd, 3rd and 4th quartiles were associated with 28, 45 and 67% higher proBNP levels (p < 0.01 for all). For changes in proBNP over the follow-up period, and after multivariable adjustment including baseline proBNP, a 1-SD increment in adiponectin was associated with a 25 pg/ml increase in proBNP (p < 0.01), while those in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th quartiles of adiponectin were associated increases of 5, 28 and 65 pg/ml (p = 0.74, 0.09 and < 0.01, respectively). There were no significant multiplicative interactions by race or obesity status. However, there was a significant interaction between adiponectin and gender for proBNP, such that the associations detailed above were significantly stronger in men. Leptin was not associated with proBNP (data now shown). Conclusions: Higher adiponectin, but not leptin, is significantly associated with higher levels of proBNP, as well as significant longitudinal increases in proBNP. The findings appear to be stronger in men.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.111
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiovascular Health and Risk Factors→French-language works237,207→