Le Cadre juridique interaméricain face aux problèmes engendrés par la traite des femmes et des enfants (The Inter-American Legal Framework and the Challenges Posed by the Trafficking of Women and Children)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les conventions interamericaines n’ont pas eu une forte influence sur la legislation nationale des pays de la region et sur leurs activites pour combattre la traite. La force et l'efficacite des dispositions des conventions interamericaines pertinentes dependent manifestement du nombre des adhesions dont elles font l'objet et des mecanismes mis en place pour en controler l'application. Les problemes sont multiples sur les deux fronts : un nombre peu eleve de ratifications pour l’un des traites; et des mesures d’execution faibles ou inexistantes pour les deux autres. L’analyse commande donc la conclusion que les traites interamericains ne jouent pas un role d’avant-garde dans la lutte contre la traite des femmes et des enfants dans les Ameriques et les Antilles. De fait, dans la region, l’impulsion la plus importante ne provient pas du cadre juridique interamericain mais d’une legislation antitraite americaine. Or si, dans ce chapitre, nous constatons que les sanctions economiques envisagees dans la legislation americaine constituent une force plus contraignante que les normes juridiques des conventions regionales, nous y soulignons egalement que cette approche tend a favoriser les interets americains et qu’une lutte plus holistique contrerait plus efficacement la traite des femmes et des enfants dans les Ameriques.Inter-American human rights treaties have not had a strong impact on the legislation and policies of countries of the region when it comes to their activities to combat trafficking. The strength and effectiveness of the relevant inter-American conventions clearly depends on the number of ratifications and the enforcement mechanisms established to monitor their implementation. Problems exist on both fronts: few ratification for one treaty, and weak or non-existent enforcement mechanisms for the other two. This article concludes that inter-American treaties do not play a leading role in the fight against trafficking in women and children in the Americas and the Caribbean. In fact, in the region, the most important impetus for combating trafficking does not come from the Inter-American legal framework, but from anti-trafficking legislation in the United States. Indeed, the economic levers used by the U.S. to force States to deal with trafficking problems has a stronger impact than regional conventions. This approach, however, tends to favour U.S. foreign policy interests instead of creating a holistic and effective policy to counter the problem of trafficking of women and children in the Americas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".