Isolation and identification of diazotrophic bacteria from internal tissues of<i>Pinus contorta</i>and<i>Thuja plicata</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lodgepole pine ( Pinus contorta var. latifolia Engelm. ex S. Watson) and western red cedar ( Thuja plicata Donn ex D. Don) are capable of growing in soils that are severely nitrogen-limited. A rarely evaluated but possible nitrogen source for gymnosperms growing at nutrient poor sites is nitrogen fixation by endophytic bacteria. To investigate this possibility, we looked for nitrogen-fixing bacteria in surface-sterilized needle, stem, and root tissues of naturally regenerating lodgepole pine and western red cedar seedlings (2–4 years old) and trees (>20 years old) growing near Williams Lake, Chilliwack Lake, and Boston Bar, British Columbia, Canada. Ninety-nine bacterial isolates were obtained by plating surface-sterilized plant tissue extracts on tryptic soy agar (TSA) and combined carbon medium agar (CCMA), a nitrogen-free medium. Bacterial isolates were identified using gas chromatographic fatty acid methyl ester (GC-FAME) and 16S rRNA gene analyses and were evaluated for nitrogenase activity using an acetylene reduction assay. Representatives of the genera Bacillus and Paenibacillus dominated the culturable endophytic bacterial community in tissues of both tree species, with three Paenibacillus isolates and one Dyadobacter fermentans strain demonstrating consistently high acetylene-reduction activities. Our results raise the possibility that endophytic nitrogen fixation provides a supplementary nitrogen source for naturally regenerated lodgepole pine and western red cedar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".