MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2210855274

Urinary bladder melanosis associated with urothelial dysplasia and invasive urothelial carcinoma: a report of two cases.

2013· article· en· W2210855274 on OpenAlexaff
Premal Patel, Geoffrey Gotto, Alexander Kavanagh, Al Bashir S, TA Bismar, Kiril Trpkov

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Canadian institutionsCalgary Laboratory ServicesUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMelanosisMedicineCystoscopyUrinary bladderPathologyUrinary systemBiopsyMalignancyDysplasiaMelanomaUrologyInternal medicineCancer research
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Melanosis is defined as an abnormal or excessive deposition of melanin within cells and/or tissues. It typically presents as a cutaneous or buccal mucosal lesion, but rare cases of bladder melanosis have also been documented. Melanosis of the urinary bladder is typically considered a benign condition, but it has also been described in association with malignant melanoma and urothelial carcinoma. CASES: We report the cases of 2 patients who presented with melanosis of the urinary bladder. One patient presented with melanosis of the urinary bladder together with urothelial dysplasia. Melanosis was incidentally identified during a cystoscopy for ureteral stones. A second patient presented with hematuria and was found to have a muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma with focal small nested morphology together with melanosis. We also present a literature review of the bladder melanosis and an overview of other bladder melanocytic lesions, which include primary and metastatic melanoma and blue nevus. CONCLUSION: Initial evaluation for bladder melanosis should include cystoscopy and upper urinary tract imaging. Biopsy is essential to establish the diagnosis and rule out associated malignancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0090.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management→French-language works237,207→