MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2211012749 · doi:10.1016/j.crvasa.2015.05.012

Summary of the ESC/EACTS 2014 Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Prepared by the Czech Society of Cardiology

2015· article· en· W2211012749 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Petr Kala, Michael Želı́zko, Jan Pirk

Bibliographic record

VenueCor et Vasa · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineCardiologyEjection fractionMyocardial infarctionCoronary artery diseasePercutaneous coronary interventionRevascularizationHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tel.: +420 532232205; fax: +420 532232161. E-mail address: pkala@fnbrno.cz (P. Kala). Abbreviations: ACCF/AHA, American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association; ACS, acute coronary syndromes; AF, atrial fibrillation; ASA, acetylsalicylic acid; BMS, bare-metal stent; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CAD, coronary artery disease; CARDIA, Coronary Artery Revascularization in Diabetes; CAS, carotid artery stenting; CCS, Canadian Cardiovascular Society; CEA, carotid endarterectomy; CKD, chronic kidney disease; COURAGE, Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation; CTO, chronic total occlusion; CURRENT-OASIS 7, Clopidogrel and Aspirin Optimal Dose Usage to Reduce Recurrent Events – Seventh Organization to Assess Strategies in Ischemic Syndromes 7; DES, drug-eluting stent; DTB, door-to-balloon time; EACTS, European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery; EAPCI, European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions; ESC, European Society of Cardiology; FAME, Fractional Flow Reserve vs. Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation; FFR, fractional flow reserve; FINESSE, Facilitated Intervention with Enhanced Reperfusion Speed to Stop Events; FREEDOM, Future Revascularization Evaluation in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; GPI/IIb/IIIa, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors; HR, hazard ratio; IABP, intra-aortic balloon pump; IABP-SHOCK, Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock; ICD, implantable cardioverter defibrillator; IMA, internal mammary artery; INR, international normalized ratio; IVUS, intravascular ultrasound imaging; LAA, left atrial appendage; LAD, left anterior descending; LM, left main; LMWH, low-molecular-weight heparin; LoE, level of evidence; LV, left ventricle/left ventricular; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; MACCE, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event; MACE, major adverse cardiac event; MI, myocardial infarction; NOAC, non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant; NSTE-ACS, non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome; On-TIME-2, Continuing TIrofiban in Myocardial infarction Evaluation; OR, odds ratio; PAD, peripheral artery disease; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; PLATO, Study of Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes; PRAMI, Preventive Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction; PRECOMBAT, Premier of Randomized Comparison of; RCT, randomized clinical trial; RRR, relative risk reduction; SCAD, stable coronary artery disease; SHOCK, Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock; STEMI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; STICH, Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure; SVG, saphenous vein graft; SVR, surgical ventricular reconstruction; SYNTAX, Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery; TAVI, transcatheter aortic valve implantation; TIA, transient ischaemic attack; TIMACS, Timing of Intervention in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes; TIMI, Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction; TRITON TIMI-38, TRial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet InhibitioN with Prasugrel–Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 38; TVR, target vessel revascularization; UFH, unfractionated heparin; VD, vessel disease. Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.108
Threshold uncertainty score0.205

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCor et VasaSame topicCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207