MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Disassortative pollen transfer in distylous Palicourea padifolia (Rubiaceae), a hummingbird-pollinated shrub

2007· article· en· W2212294993 on OpenAlex
Angélica Hernández, Juan Francisco Ornelas

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEcoscience · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyPollinatorPollenPollinationHummingbirdOutcrossingHeterostylyBotanyShrubNectarPollen tubePopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distylous polymorphisms represent a useful model system for studying the functioning of flower morphology because floral morphs have reciprocal flower developmental pathways and co-occur in the same environment such that they share the same pollinators. Distylous plants typically display both reciprocal herkogamy and a heteromorphic incompatibility system, which allows mating only between morphs. In this paper, we document morphspecific patterns in floral morphology and pollen receipt of Palicourea padifolia, a hummingbird-pollinated shrub. Floral traits typically associated with the functioning of distyly, reciprocal herkogamy, and population morph ratios of flowering individuals from 10 populations were measured and quantified. Pollen receipt on stigmas of the same measured flowers was then used to determine the effectiveness of distyly in promoting disassortative pollen transfer. Pollen of long-styled flowers was more effective in reaching legitimate stigmas, while short-styled morphs were more successful in the reception of legitimate pollen across populations. Variation in pollen receipt across populations was not explained by reciprocal herkogamy, which typically promotes legitimate pollination. Natural pollination resulting in a higher proportion of legitimate pollen in short-styled flowers increased with stigma–anther separation (promotion of outcross pollination) and width of corolla entrance (avoidance of self-pollination).Nomenclature: Taylor, 1989; 1993; 1997; Burger & Taylor, 1993.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.537
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it