Workplace indoor radon survey in Nova Scotia, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Radon is a naturally occurring gas emitted from the radioactive decay of uranium. A systematic radon assessment carried out in Nova Scotia (NS) has shown that many areas in the province are radon prone due to elevated levels of natural radioactivity in soil. Very little occupational radon data is available for NS, so this survey was designed to collect basic radon information from several NS workplaces in a nonrandomized fashion. Twenty three workplaces were contacted for participation in the study, and 21 participated for a 91% participation rate. The survey was conducted by placing 170 alpha track detectors within 21 workplaces for a minimum three-month sampling period and comparing the results with the Canadian Guidelines for the Management of Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials (NORM) and the Health Canada Guidelines. The results indicated that 19 of the workplaces had average radon concentrations below 150 Bqm−3, with only two workplaces having at least one measurement above this concentration. Both workplaces with elevated measurements had fewer than 25 employees and a lack of mechanical ventilation. The range of results for all workplaces was from −2.0 to 202.1 Bqm−3, with an overall average of 25.7 Bqm−3 for all workplaces. Future surveys should focus on small workplaces (<25 employees) with a lack of mechanical ventilation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".