IDENTITY AND SOCIAL INTEGRATION: GIRLS FROM A MINORITY ETHNO-CULTURAL GROUP IN CANADA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT. This article looks at identity as an important factor in integration into society. Integration is not only personal and individual process, it is also dialectical one. It involves contradictions (conflicts) in individual self-construction (identity). It also implies construction and re-construction of social relationships related to an individual's experiences defined by their location in terms of gender, race, culture and class. This process of reconstruction of identity is what has been called a process of 'becoming' and 'being'. Canadian girls of South Asian origin strive hard to live up to their parents' expectations and yet they do not possess culture in form identical to their parents. They are creating hybrid identity in new context using part of the cultural capital from their parents and creating space for themselves in Canadian society. RESUME. Cet article percoit l'identite comme facteur important d'integration dans la societe. L'integration n'est pas seulement un processus personnel et individuel, mais un processus dialectique. Il comprend des contradictions (conflits) dans la construction du moi (identite). Il presuppose egalement la construction et la reconstruction de rapports sociaux ayant un rapport avec les experiences des sujets definis par la place qu'ils occupent sur le plan du sexe, de la race, de la culture et de la classe. Ce processus de reconstruction identitaire est ce que l'on appelle «le processus du 'devenir' et de letre'». Les jeunes filles canadiennes originaires d'Asie du Sud s'evertuent repondre aux attentes de leurs parents, meme si elles ne possedent pas une culture dont la forme est identique celle de leurs parents. Elles creent donc une identite hybride dans un contexte nouveau en utilisant partiellement le capital culturel de leurs parents et en creant un «espace» pour elles-memes dans la societe canadienne.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".