L'image en mouvement en classe d'univers social : Étude sur les pratiques déclarées des enseignantes et enseignants du secondaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le domaine de l’univers social du Programme de formation de l’ecole quebecoise (PFEQ), le programme Histoire et education a la citoyennete (HEC) au secondaire a pour objectif d’initier l’eleve a la pensee historique. Cependant, les eleves maitrisent peu cette pensee, considerant l’histoire comme un recit dont la veracite ne peut etre mise en question. L’image en mouvement en classe d’histoire, particulierement le cinema, peut en favoriser l’apprentissage. Une enquete exploratoire a ete menee afin de savoir quelles sont les pratiques declarees des enseignantes et enseignants d’univers social a l’egard de l’exploitation des documents audiovisuels en classe. L’image en mouvement est-elle utilisee par les enseignantes et enseignants d’histoire au secondaire? Dans quel but et quel contexte? Les resultats montrent que les enseignants utilisent l’image en mouvement en classe d’histoire, mais manquent de balises claires afin de bien encadrer cette pratique et de faire progresser adequatement l’eleve vers la pensee historique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".