MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2215476320 · doi:10.1182/blood.v122.21.437.437

Fine-Mapping and Genome Editing Reveal An Essential Erythroid Enhancer At The HbF-Associated BCL11A Locus

2013· article· en· W2215476320 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel E. Bauer, Sophia C. Kamran, Samuel Lessard, Jian Xu, Yuko Fujiwara, Carrie Lin, Zhen Shao, Matthew C. Canver, Elenoe C. Smith, Luca Pinello, Peter J. Sabo, Jeff Vierstra, Richard A. Voit, Guo‐Cheng Yuan, Matthew H. Porteus, J Stamatoyannopoulos, Guillaume Lettre, Stuart H. Orkin

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyChromosome conformation captureEnhancerGeneticsLocus (genetics)ChromatinTranscription activator-like effector nucleaseGenome editingChromatin immunoprecipitationCRISPRTranscription factorGeneMolecular biologyPromoterGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have ascertained numerous trait-associated common genetic variants localized to regulatory DNA. The hypothesis that regulatory variation accounts for substantial heritability has undergone scarce experimental evaluation. Common variation at BCL11A is estimated to explain ∼15% of the trait variance in fetal hemoglobin (HbF) level but the functional variants remain unknown. Materials and Methods We use chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), DNase I sensitivity and chromosome conformation capture to evaluate the BCL11A locus in mouse and human primary erythroblasts. We extensively genotype 1,263 samples from the Collaborative Study of Sickle Cell Disease within three HbF-associated erythroid DNase I hypersensitive sites (DHSs) at BCL11A. We pyrosequence heterozygous erythroblasts to assess allele-specific transcription factor binding and gene expression. We conduct transgenic analysis by mouse zygotic microinjection and genome editing with transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) and clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated nuclease 9 (Cas9) RNA-guided nucleases. Results Common genetic variation at BCL11A associated with HbF level lies in noncoding sequences decorated by an erythroid enhancer chromatin signature. Fine-mapping this putative regulatory DNA uncovers a motif-disrupting common variant associated with reduced GATA1 and TAL1 transcription factor binding, modestly diminished BCL11A expression and elevated HbF. This variant, rs1427407, accounts for the HbF association of the previously reported sentinel SNPs. The composite element functions in vivo as a developmental stage-specific lineage-restricted enhancer. Genome editing reveals that the enhancer is required in erythroid but dispensable in B-lymphoid cells for expression of BCL11A. We demonstrate species-specific functional components of the composite enhancer in mouse as compared to human erythroid precursor cells. The mouse sequences homologous to the human DHS sufficient to drive reporter activity are dispensable from the mouse composite element, whereas the adjacent DHS, whose human homolog does not direct reporter activity, is absolutely required for BCL11A expression. Conclusions We describe a comprehensive and widely applicable approach, including chromatin mapping followed by fine-mapping, allele-specific ChIP and gene expression studies, and functional analyses, to reveal causal variants and critical elements. We assert that functional validation of regulatory DNA ought to include perturbation of the endogenous genomic context by genome editing and not solely rely on in vitro or ectopic surrogate assays. These results validate the hypothesis that common variation modulates cell type-specific regulatory elements, and reveal that although functional variants themselves may be of modest impact, their harboring elements may be critical for appropriate gene expression. We speculate that species-level functional differences in components of the composite enhancer might partially account for differences in timing of globin gene expression among animals. We suggest that the GWAS-marked BCL11A enhancer represents a highly attractive target for therapeutic genome editing for the major b-hemoglobin disorders. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersFrench-language works237,207