Bibliographic record
Abstract
The theory of terminology was developed by the founder of the Vienna school, Wuster, on objectivist foundations (a term as a linguistic symbol formed by words or elements of words, the structured nature of the vocabulary) with the aim of standardising the concepts and terms. The main schools of the theory of terminology were established approximately at the same time in Vienna, Prague, and Moscow and later also in Quebec. Czech terminography derives its tradition from the Prague Linguistic Circle (Havranek, Roudny, Tejnor, Kocourek), whose aim was the structural and functional description of specialised language and the standardisation of terminology by authoritative institutions. Its concept of specialised language as part of specialised communication was developed in the 1970s in connection with the communicative and pragmatic orientation of linguistics as a socioterminological trend (in France and Canada). Modern terminology moves from an onomasiological approach to a communicative one (Sager); more recently use is made of the findings of cognitive science and of language corpora for the collection of excerpts (Temmerman).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".