MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2215991120

Front Matter for In Search of the Ethical Lawyer: Stories from the Canadian Legal Profession

2016· paratext· en· W2215991120 on OpenAlexaffabout
Adam M. Dodek, Alice Woolley, Paul Wells

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2016
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Education and Practice Innovations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLawEconomic JusticeLegal professionSociologyHistoryPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper contains the front matter - Table of Contents, Foreword by Paul Wells of Maclean's and the Introduction - to this book. We wrote this book in order to attempt to tell the stories about some important cases and people in Canadian legal ethics. All too often appellate cases and texts strip out the facts from cases. However, as any good lawyer will attest, the facts matter. Our goal in writing this book was to put the people back into the conversation about law, at least when it comes to Canadian legal ethics.In Search of the Ethical Lawyer contains stories about important cases, issues and people in Canadian legal ethics. It includes chapters by David Asper, Constance Backhouse, Janine Benedet, Brent Cotter, Richard Devlin, Adam Dodek, Trevor Farrow, Allan Hutchinson, Micah Rankin, Lorne Sossin and Alice Woolley.Here is the Table of Contents: Foreword / Paul WellsIntroduction / Adam Dodek and Alice Woolley1 Keeping Secrets or Saving Lives: What Is a Lawyer to Do? / Adam Dodek2 Putting Up a Defence: Sex, Murder, and Videotapes / Allan C. Hutchinson3 No One’s Interested in Something You Didn’t Do: Freeing David Milgaard the Ugly Way / David Asper4 Begun in Faith, Continued in Determination: Burnley Allan (Rocky) Jones and the Egalitarian Practice of Law / Richard F. Devlin5 Feminist Lawyering: Insiders and Outsiders / Janine Benedet6 Gender and Race in the Construction of Professionalism: Historical Perspectives / Constance Backhouse7 The Helping Profession: Can Pro Bono Lawyers Make Sick Children Well? / Lorne Sossin8 A New Wave of Access to Justice Reform in Canada / Trevor C.W. Farrow9 Michelle’s Story: Creativity and Meaning in Legal Practice / Alice Woolley10 Ian Scott: Renaissance Man, Consummate Advocate, Attorney General Extraordinaire / W. Brent Cotter11 Gerry Laarakker: From Rustic Rambo to Rebel with a Cause / Micah Rankin

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicLegal Education and Practice InnovationsFrench-language works237,207