Counterion Anchoring Effect on the Structure of the Solid-State Inclusion Complexes of β-Cyclodextrin and Sodium Perfluorooctanoate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Characterization of the structure and dynamics for the solid inclusion complexes (ICs) between β-cyclodextrin (β-CD; host) and sodium perfluorooctanoate (SPFO; guest) was carried out using 1 H/ 19 F/ 13 C NMR spectroscopy. The 1:1 and 2:1 β-CD/SPFO solid complexes were prepared by a modified dissolution method. Evidence for the formation of β-CD/SPFO ICs was provided by 13 C DP (direct polarization) and CP (cross-polarization) solid-state NMR spectroscopy with magic angle spinning (MAS) at 20 kHz. The complexation-induced shifts (CIS) of 1 H/ 19 F/ 13 C nuclei between solution and the solid state for β-CD/SPFO complexes and the closely related complexes of β-CD/PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid) were compared. The counterion effect for SPFO and PFOA was observed according to their variable structure and binding as inclusion compounds with β-CD. The effect of sodium versus hydronium counterions on the structure and dynamics of inclusion complexes for these systems was supported by DSC, TGA, FT-IR, and powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD). Simulations of the CF 3 19 F NMR with MAS at 25 kHz and selected dipolar coupling strengths were utilized in conjunction with deconvolution analyses of the experimental CF 3 lineshapes to probe the dynamic properties of SPFO and its complexes with β-CD. The dynamics of the guest are influenced by the host/guest binding geometry and the stoichiometry of the complex, where free rotation of the CF 3 group as well as rotations of the C–F bonds occur. 19 F DP/MAS NMR results and spin–lattice ( T 1 ) and spin–spin ( T 2 ) relaxation times in the laboratory frame at variable temperatures in the solid phase indicate that the dynamics of SPFO in β-CD/SPFO complexes are unique compared to those of PFOA in β-CD/PFOA complexes, due to the role of counterion effects of the guest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".