MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W221631749

Learning to Be Human: An Interview with William Pope.L

2006· article· en· W221631749 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueComparative technology transfer and society · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheatre and Performance Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLuckHumanityCompassionSociologyArt historyArtLawPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Everyone has to before they walk. Even so, it is also true that when people achieve a certain status, they may feel they are more important than another person. The rich look down on the poor. The beautiful look down on the plain. The powerful look down on the weak. But status is fleeting, we all begin on the same level with the same luck. Crawling brings us back to basics. We crawl, as small children, not because we are humiliated but because we are learning to be human. Crawling is a way to remind ourselves of our common struggle to be human. --Statement for Bringing the Decarie to the Mountain It was motherhood that initiated my struggle to be human. Pathetic as it is to admit, it wasn't until I was enraptured with the helpless person I held in my postpartum arms that I truly understood what it meant to walk in another's shoes. The simplest things seemed monumental to my son, like trying to lift his weak neck from the pillow or line up a piece of toast with his lips. Crawling seemed colossal, and I wept when he finally reached the couch. Perhaps this arrival at compassion, delayed as it may have been, is what ultimately brought me to the work of performance artist William Pope.L. [ILLUSTRATION OMITTED] The first photograph that I saw of Pope.L showed him inching along a city street, belly barely off the ground, clad in a soiled Superman suit. His glasses were skewed; he wore kneepads with holes, a skateboard strapped to his back, and a determined but drained look upon his face. By that time, the baby who taught me empathy was enamored of his own equally threadbare superhero costumes, and I was as taken with the image for sentimental reasons as I was piqued by its impetus. As I began to research Pope.L's work, which spans at least twenty years, I was most struck by these as he referred to them, performance pieces in which he took to the streets in the name of, and in support for, those who lived upon them. By literally crawling, his face centimeters from the cement and at one with the detritus and dirt, Pope.L became a visible bodily metaphor for the struggles that the homeless and disabled endure on a daily basis. Since the late 1970s, Pope.L has completed dozens of crawls in many countries, as well as countless performance pieces, nearly all of which ask viewers to reconsider their socially ingrained presumptions about class, race, and by extension, privilege. He routinely has a camera person with him to record reactions of passersby, which range from vociferous protest to nervous dismissal. His most critically acclaimed to date, The Great White Way (GWW), is a continual work-in-progress in which Pope.L plans to journey from the Statue of Liberty more than twenty miles uptown. As he is only able to complete the laborious segments intermittently, it is estimated that it will take over seven years to finish. Obviously it is a journey far more epic than my son's trek across the living room. Nevertheless, viewing images of a bedraggled Pope.L in his blue and red suit, resting on a sidewalk after one of his more grueling crawls, I cried again. In an age of overly cerebral, self-obsessional artwork that is difficult to decode (even if one wished to), here was an honest act of selfless symbolism. I wondered, whose work was truly difficult?; whom was I seeing, not just in the art world but in real life? And finally, in an age of inflated celebrity gods, who were my real heroes? These questions compelled me to introduce Pope.L's work to my students, and his work became the mainstay of our discussions on contemporary art's potential to change lives, as well as a way into discussing such unfashionable concepts as charity and poverty. But seeing art in reproduction pales in comparison to engaging with it, so when I heard that the artist would be organizing a mass crawl up the slope of Montreal's Mont Royal this past June, I took part. The performance, titled Bringing the Decarie to the Mountain, was part of the Decarie, a community-based exhibition project organized by the Saidye Bronfman Centre for the Arts. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score0.644

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it