Laryngeal paralysis in dogs and cats.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Laringealna je paraliza bolest koja se cesto javlja u pasa, a relativno rij etko u macaka. Postoje dva oblika laringealne paralize, nasljedni i steceni. Nasljedni se oblik bolesti javlja u mladih pasa, obicno rano unutar prve godine života. Može se javiti kao mononeuropatij a sto je slucaj u pasmina Flandrij ski Buvij e i Sibirski Husky ili kao tzv. laringealna paraliza-polineuropatij a kompleks ko ji se javlja u rotvajlera i dalmatinskih pasa. Steceni se oblik javlja u starih pasa velikih i divovskih pasmina poput labrador retrivera, irskih setera i afganistanskih hrtova. U macaka se javlja samo steceni oblik bolesti i to cesce kao sekundarna komplikacij a drugih procesa, a rjeđe kao primarna bolest. Klinicki znaci ove bolesti su netolerancij a fi zicke aktivnosti, inspiratorni stridor, inspiratorna dispneja, grcanje, kasalj i disfonij a. Znakovi lako mogu napredovati u respiratorni distres ili arest. Danas se malo zna o etiologij i ove bolesti pa je terapij a usmjerena na uklanjanje laringealne opstrukcij e. Blaži se oblik bolesti može terapirati konzervativno dok jace izraženi klinicki simptomi zahtij evaju kirursku terapij u. Jednostrana ili dvostrana aritenoidna lateralizacij a je najbolja kirurska terapij a laringealne paralize, no komplikacij e su ceste. Najcesca komplikacij a je aspiracij ska upala pluca.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".