MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2216775842 · doi:10.1152/jappl.2001.90.6.2041

Stiffness of peripheral airway folding membrane in rabbits

2001· article· en· W2216775842 on OpenAlexaff
R. K. Lambert, Peter D. Paré, Mitsushi Okazawa

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physiology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrachealis muscleAnatomyAirway resistanceAirwayChemistryFlexural rigidityCompression (physics)PeripheralBiophysicsMedicineRespiratory systemAnesthesiaInternal medicineMaterials scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have observed that small, membranous bronchioles from rabbits, in which the smooth muscle is not activated, experience a critical elastic buckling involving the whole airway wall during deflation of the lung. This implies that, at some point during the deflation, the airway wall goes from being in a state of tension to a state of compression. At the transition, there is neither net tension nor net compression in the wall, and the transmural pressure difference must, therefore, be zero. Thus at this point, the pressure difference across the muscle that results from the passive stress in the muscle is just balanced by the pressure difference across the folded mucosal membrane. We estimated the muscle stress, and hence the pressure across the muscle, from published data on rabbit trachealis (Opazo-Saez A and Paré PD, J Appl Physiol 77: 1638-1643, 1994) and equated this to the pressure across the folded membrane. By using a theoretical prediction of this pressure (Lambert RK, Codd SL, Alley MR, and Pack RJ, J Appl Physiol 77: 1206-1216, 1994), together with the results of our morphometric measurements on these airways, we estimated that the flexural rigidity of the folding membrane in peripheral rabbit airways is of the order of 10(-12) Pa x m3. This value implies that, in these airways, membrane folding provides significant resistance to airway smooth muscle shortening.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.500
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysiologySame topicTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineFrench-language works237,207