Role of endotoxin in the expression of endothelial selectins after cecal ligation and perforation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to determine 1) the changes in endothelial cell adhesion molecule expression that occur in a clinically relevant model of sepsis and 2) the dependence of these changes on endotoxin [lipopolysaccharide (LPS)]. The dual radiolabeled monoclonal antibody technique was used to quantify the expression of E- and P-selectin in LPS-sensitive (C3HeB/FeJ) and LPS-insensitive (C3H/HeJ) mice that were subjected to acute peritonitis by cecal ligation and perforation (CLP). At 6 h after CLP, the expression of both E- and P-selectin was increased in the gut (mesentery, pancreas, and small and large bowel) compared with the sham-operated and/or control animals, with a more marked response noted in LPS-insensitive mice. The lung also exhibited an increased P-selectin expression in both mouse strains. An accumulation of granulocytes, assessed using tissue myeloperoxidase activity, was noted in the lung and intestine of LPS-sensitive but not LPS-insensitive mice exposed to CLP. These results indicate that the CLP model of sepsis is associated with an upregulation of endothelial selectins in the gut vasculature and that enteric LPS does not contribute to this endothelial cell activation response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".