MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2218172892 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b11072

DNA Strand Breaks Induced by 0–1.5 eV UV Photoelectrons under Atmospheric Pressure

2015· article· en· W2218172892 on OpenAlexafffund
Jiawen Liu, Xiaobin Yao, Pierre Cloutier, Yi Zheng, Léon Sanche

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPhotoelectric effectFluenceElectronAtomic physicsWork functionTantalumSubstrate (aquarium)Atmospheric pressureX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyPhoton energyMaterials scienceLeesPhotonChemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)OptoelectronicsPhysicsNanotechnologyOpticsLayer (electronics)IonNuclear magnetic resonanceNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vacuum experiments with monoenergetic low-energy electrons (LEEs) impacting on biomolecules have revealed basic mechanisms of radiobiological damage. To move closer to cellular conditions, we explore the possibility of damaging DNA at standard atmospheric pressure with electrons of 0–1.5 eV. These electrons are produced by UV light incident on a tantalum or n-Si substrate, onto which a five-monolayer film of DNA is deposited. Total conformational damage, cross-links, and double- and single-strand breaks (SSBs) are measured as a function of LEE fluence. The photoelectron energy distribution can be modified by changing the work function of the substrate or the photon energy. In a N 2 atmosphere with a tantalum substrate, the yields of SSBs (5 ± 2 × 10 –14 electron –1 molecule –1 ) and their number per energy deposited (46 ± 36 × 10 –4 /eV) are in good agreement with those obtained, under similar conditions, by monoenergetic 0.5–1.0 eV electron impact in vacuo and 1.5 KeV X-ray photoelectrons at atmospheric pressure, respectively. SSB is the only conformational change detected; it results from electron capture on a DNA base followed by dissociative electron attachment at the phosphate unit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.310

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicRadiation Therapy and DosimetryFrench-language works237,207