Influence of interface on the dielectric response, electrical and thermal conductivity of high density polyethylene based composites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The influence of interface on the dielectric response, electrical and thermal conductivity of the filled high density polyethylene (HDPE) was studied. Two types of composites containing 10 wt% of polyaniline (PAni) as filler was used. It was shown that the degradation temperature of the composites is slightly lower than that of the pure matrix. The crystalline content was found to remain unchanged at 67% for all composites except in the case of HDPE/PAni core-shell structure which exhibits a slightly higher crystalline content of 75%. The presence of PAni in the composite systems contributed to the increase of the conductivity by about eight orders of magnitude for the composite when stearic acid was used as a compatibilizer. The thermal conductivity of HDPE/PAni 10 wt% films was also found to remain unchanged at 0.35 W/m.K. The microstructure study by scanning electron microscopy revealed that the stearic acid helped to achieve a reasonably good dispersion of PAni in HDPE matrix.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".