Airway hyperreactivity is frequent in non-asthmatic children with sickle cell disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Asthma is associated with poorer outcomes in sickle cell disease (SCD). Whether AHR can exist in SCD as a distinct entity, separate and independent of asthma, is unknown. AIMS: Our goal was to elucidate the prevalence of AHR, as measured by a methacholine challenge test (MCT), in children with SCD who did not have concomitant asthma or any recent history of acute chest syndrome (ACS). To determine if AHR was associated with asthma-like symptoms, we compared the results of the MCT to a validated asthma questionnaire. We also examined if a correlation between AHR and inflammatory markers exists. METHODS: AHR was identified with a positive MCT defined as a provocation concentration (PC20 ) < 4 mg/ml. The children and/or their parents completed the ISAAC (International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Children) questionnaire. We obtained blood, urine, and exhaled breath condensate samples. We measured cysteinyl leukotriene levels in urine and exhaled breath condensate via enzyme immunoassay. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of forty children (72.5%) had a positive MCT. Nine (31.0%) also reported asthma-like symptoms on questionnaire. Inflammatory markers did not correlate with AHR. Among MCT positive subjects, those on hydroxyurea had significantly less severe AHR as quantified by PC20 (P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: In children with SCD, there is a high prevalence of AHR that is not associated with asthma-like symptoms. AHR may be a distinct entity in children with SCD, existing in the absence of concomitant asthma. Hydroxyurea therapy might lessen the severity of AHR in affected individuals. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016; 51:950-957. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".