Recent Developments and Design Challenges of High-Performance Ring Oscillator CMOS Time-to-Digital Converters
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Time-to-digital converters (TDCs) are increasingly used as building blocks in biomedical imaging, digital communication, and measurement instrumentation systems. When fabricated in deep-submicrometer (DSM) CMOS technology, TDCs have outstanding time stamping capability on the order of picoseconds. Typically, the timing resolution of a TDC directly determines the minimum resolvable spatial resolution in time-of-flight (ToF) measurements. It also limits the signal-to-noise ratio in ToF positron emission tomography and the in-band noise in an all-digital phase-locked-loop. In TDCs, good linearity and precision result in high measurement accuracy, while the detectable range is limited by its dynamic range. In addition, size and power consumption are of significant importance in large-scale array implementations such as image sensors. Here, we discuss the most recent developments in CMOS TDCs, with an emphasis on ring-oscillator-based TDC and its variants, due to their suitability for array designs with less area overhead. In addition, key performance metrics, and accurate cost-effective characterization methods will be discussed. Finally, future perspectives of CMOS TDCs will be highlighted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it