MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2219595186

On the metric dimension of Mobius ladders

2012· article· en· W2219595186 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Murtaza Ali, Gohar Ali, Muhammad Imran, Abdul Qudair Baig, Muhammad Kashif Shafiq

Bibliographic record

VenueArs Combinatoria · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGraph Labeling and Dimension Problems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombinatoricsMetric dimensionMathematicsVertex (graph theory)Dimension (graph theory)Cardinality (data modeling)Metric spaceConstant (computer programming)Packing dimensionDiscrete mathematicsGraphMinkowski–Bouligand dimensionChordal graphMathematical analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

If G is a connected graph, the distance d(u, v) between two vertices u, v is an element of V(G) is the length of a shortest path between them. Let W = {w(1), w(2), ... , w(k)} be an ordered set of vertices of G and let v be a vertex of G. The representation r(v vertical bar W) of v with respect to W is the k-tuple (d(v, w(1)), d(v, w(2)), ... , d(v, w(k))). If distinct vertices of G have distinct representations with respect to W, then W is called a resolving set or locating set for G. A resolving set of minimum cardinality is called a basis for G and this cardinality is the metric dimension of G, denoted by dim(G). A family G of connected graphs is a family with constant metric dimension if dim(G) does not depend upon the choice of G in G. In this paper, we are dealing with the study of metric dimension of Mobius ladders. We prove that Mobius ladder M-n constitute a family of cubic graphs with constant metric dimension and only three vertices suffice to resolve all the vertices of Mobius ladder M-n except when n equivalent to 2(mod 8). It is natural to ask for the characterization of regular graphs with constant metric dimension.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArs CombinatoriaSame topicGraph Labeling and Dimension ProblemsFrench-language works237,207