Necessity Research on Reflecting “Student Oriented” Education From Ecoaesthetics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
“Student oriented” is foundation of education. Students’ development is the basis of existence and development of education. Facing modern ecological and spirit crisis, how to develop education, and which kind to be developed and other questions about education exist, should get proper answers as soon as possible. Ecoaesthetics provides a new education thinking mode. Ecoaesthetics education emphasizes on stimulating, adjusting, guiding and blending life rhythm of student as subject. It gives education a new spirit guide through value, behavior as well as exist form. This changes and removes traditional subject-object dual opposite thinking ways, and gives rise to a revolution of education thinking mode. It is “student oriented”, cares about and cherishes human value, should pay more attention to higher-level interaction between human and nature (or kind). Present education should break through utilitarian tie. Human being should be sublimated to ecology as a whole. Ecoaesthetics which stresses nonutility, inter-construction and integrality provides a new methodology instruction. On the basis of exploration on connotation and extension of ecoaesthetics, this paper, from saving education moral crisis, rectifying individual competitiveness and segregation phenomenon of co-evolution as well as “student oriented” ecoaesthetics, explores necessity of “student oriented” education reflection from ecoaesthetics, provides some theoretical value for education returning to human needs and life demands.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".