MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2220493751

Lymphoscintigraphy for the evaluation of pediatric lymphatic abnormalities

2014· article· en· W2220493751 on OpenAlexaff
Sophie Turpin, Raymond Lambert

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphatic Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineChylothoraxLymphatic systemRadiologyLymphedemaLymphangiectasiaChyleLymphangiomatosisRadiological weaponScintigraphyGallium 67 scanNuclear medicineSurgeryComplicationPathologyInternal medicineCancer
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1997 Objectives Lymphoscintigraphy has proven to be an useful method for the evaluation of lymphatic drainage in lymphedema and in sentinel node detection . In the pediatric setting, only a few cases of chylothorax/chyloperitoneum and lymphatic malformations imaged with lymphoscintigraphy, have been reported . The aim of this study was to review the value of lymphoscintigraphy in the evaluation of such abnormalities. Methods A retrospective review was performed of all lymphoscintigraphies obtained between 2001 and 2013 in our hospital . Results were correlated to clinical and radiological findings. Lymphoscintigraphy consisted of sequential imaging over a period of 60 to 120 minutes after injection of 100-250 Uci Tc99m-filtered sulfur colloid in the interdigital spaces of the feet and/or hands . Delayed imaging was performed if needed. Results Out of 121 lymphoscintigraphies performed during that period, 24 were done to evaluate lymphatic system abnormalities in 19 patients. Fourteen studies were obtained for the evaluation of chylothorax including 9 in patients post cardiac surgery . Ten were performed for chyloperitoneum (1), intestinal lymphangiectasia (2) and lymphangiomatosis (7). Eleven studies were positive for lymphatic leak ( 5 chylothorax, 2 chyloperitoneum and 4 lymphatic malformations ) , 2 were dubious : one without definite diagnosis and one with proven lymphangiectasia. After correlation with radiological findings and follow-up , of the 11 negative studies, 6 were true negative. Five studies were considered false negative. One had high background from a previous gallium scan interfering with imaging. Three had injections on the hands only .The study was repeated in one patient and was positive after injecting on the feet . For the last patient, the first study was negative under a normal diet but became positive after switching to a high lipid diet. Conclusions Lymphoscintigraphy is an useful tool to image lymphatic abnormalities in children . Optimization of the technique include systematic injection of the 4 extremities and a high lipid diet .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.351
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLymphatic Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207