MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cullin-3 is a potential novel target for breast cancer chemoprevention and treatment

2006· article· en· W2220812750 on OpenAlexaff
Weimin Miao, Martin Loignon, Liangao Hu, Mark Basik, Gerald Batist

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerCancer researchCancerTissue microarrayUbiquitin ligaseGene silencingCell cultureTransfectionBiologyMolecular biologyCancer cellMedicineUbiquitinInternal medicineGeneBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

13070 Background: Nrf2 is a master transcription factor regulating multiple phase II carcinogen-detoxifying enzymes. Modulating Nrf2 is a current chemoprevention strategy under investigation. Nrf2 levels are regulated by the Keap1, which functions as a substrate adaptor protein targeting Nrf2 to the Cullin-3 (Cul3)-dependent ubiquitin E3 ligase complex. Methods: We used RT-PCR and Western blot to measure the mRNA and protein levels of Nrf2, Keap1 and Cul3 in human breast cancer cell lines. SiRNA and retrovectors were used to construct stable Cul3 silenced breast cancer cell lines. Agilent DNA microarray analysis was used to study the Cul3-slienced cells. Results: We discovered that Nrf2 protein levels in both nucleus and cytoplasm are significantly decreased in all breast cancer cell lines examined compared to normal human mammary epithelial cells (HMEC). This was confirmed with IHC analysis in 8 out of 10 breast cancer specimens containing normal mammary tissues for comparison. Since RT-PCR showed no change in Nrf2 mRNA levels in the breast cancer cell lines, we examined the degradation pathway of Nrf2, and we found that Cul3 is significantly overexpressed in all three breast cancer cell lines studied compared to HMEC. Silencing Cul3 using siRNA results in restoration of Nrf2 protein level, along with multiple carcinogen-detoxifying enzymes, such as GCS. The Cul3 silenced cells showed remarkable growth retardation compared to the wild type MCF-7 cell line both in vitro and in vivo in a mouse mammary fat pad cancer xenograft model. Microarray analyses of Cul3 siRNA-slinced cells demonstrated upregulation of several detoxifying genes, altered cell cycle markers and several upregulated tumor suppressor genes. Conclusions: Nrf2 is significantly downregulated in breast cancer cells, which is related to the overexpression of Cul3, and may represent sensitivity of these cells to carcinogenic transformation. Knocking down Cul3 constitutively upregulates the Nrf2 as well as multiple carcinogen-detoxifying genes. Moreover, it significantly suppressess the proliferation of cancer cells in vitro and growth of xenograft tumors in vivo. These data suggest that Cul-3 is a potential new target for breast cancer chemoprevention and treatment. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicGenomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stressFrench-language works237,207