MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2221043122 · doi:10.1155/2011/827692

Impact of <i>Candida</i> Species on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Suspected Ventilator‐Associated Pneumonia

2011· article· en· W2221043122 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marie-Soleil Delisle, David Williamson, Martin Albert, Marc M. Perreault, Xuran Jiang, Andrew G. Day, Daren K. Heyland

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Respiratory Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNosocomial Infections in ICU
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityClinical Evaluation Research UnitUniversité de MontréalHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de MontréalKingston General HospitalMontreal General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVentilator-associated pneumoniaPneumoniaIntensive care medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The significance of Candida species in respiratory tract (RT) secretions in critically ill patients is unclear. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the Canadian ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) trial was conducted. Only patients with suspected VAP whose initial cultures failed to grow any known pathogens were included. Using two fundamentally different statistical techniques that adjusted for important confounding variables, the clinical outcomes of patients with Candida species recovered from RT cultures were compared with patients whose RT cultures were not positive for Candida species. RESULTS: RT cultures yielded no identifiable bacterial pathogens in 274 patients; 68 patients had Candida species in the RT alone, while 206 patients did not have Candida species recovered from any site. The unadjusted OR of hospital mortality for patients with Candida species was 2.9 (95% CI 1.6 to 5.2; P<0.001). The hazard ratio of time to hospital discharge was 0.54 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.77; P=0.001). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that age, Acute Physiology score and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, primary diagnosis of respiratory failure, two or more comorbidities and Candida species were independently associated with increased hospital mortality. Similar trends were observed with time to hospital discharge. The association between Candida species and increased mortality remained after controlling for potential confounders using both propensity score stratification and multivariable modelling approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with suspected VAP, in whom no bacterial pathogen was identified and in whom Candida species were isolated from RT cultures, exhibited a greater burden of illness compared with similar patients without Candida. Whether Candida species colonization of RT secretions is a marker of disease severity or actually contributes to poorer clinical outcomes remains unclear.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Respiratory JournalSame topicNosocomial Infections in ICUFrench-language works237,207