MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2221401222 · doi:10.1080/10406638.2014.980433

Determination of Carcinogenic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), Aflatoxins, and Nitrosamines in Processed Fish from the Winam Gulf Area of Kenya and Estimated Potential Exposure in Human

2015· article· en· W2221401222 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolycyclic aromatic compounds · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicToxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of WindsorU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
KeywordsFluorantheneChemistryPyreneAcenaphtheneTilapiaSmoked fishAcenaphthylenePhenanthreneEnvironmental chemistryAnthraceneAquaculture of tilapiaAflatoxinCharcoalSwordfishContaminationBenzo(a)pyreneCarcinogenFish <Actinopterygii>Food scienceTunaFisheryEcologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PAHs, aflatoxins and nitrosamines were analyzed in fish samples obtained from various markets and locations within the Winam Gulf area and processed by various methods often used in Kenya. The mean concentrations of total PAHs (TPAHs) in the smoked, charcoal-grilled and fresh tilapia muscle samples ranged from 22.27–44.58, 20.36–28.51, and 11.43–16.53 μg/kg wet weight, respectively. The concentrations of individual PAHs decreased in the order smoked>charcoal-grilled>fresh fish. Of the USEPA 16 PAHs, benzo(a)pyrene, dibenzo(a,h)anthracene, indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene, and benzo(g,h,i)perylene were not detected in all samples analyzed. Fluoranthene, acenaphthene, anthracene, phenanthrene, and acenaphthylene were not detected in fresh tilapia muscles but were generated in significant amounts on the samples during smoking and charcoal-grilling. The risk of exposure to human was estimated to be 0.67 μg/day through consumption of tilapia. The TPAHs levels in fresh fish, smoked and grilled tilapia were higher than the maximum allowable concentrations as per the WHO standards. Aflatoxins were found to be generated in sun-dried Dagaa during handling and storage with total mean concentrations ranging from 0.33–1.58 μg/kg wet weight but none were detected in the fresh samples. The daily intake of aflatoxins through consumption of Dagaa was estimated to be 0.0079 μg/day during the rainy season when the drying process is less efficient. None of the nitrosamines were detected in both fresh and the deep-fried tilapia muscle samples (frying temperatures ranging from 110–170°C) after exposure to nitrites and nitrates in water, in concentrations ranging up to 10 μg/L (NO2−) and up to 160 μg/L (NO3−).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.348
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it