MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

THE FUTURE OF COLLECTIONS: AN APPROACH TO COLLECTIONS MANAGEMENT TRAINING FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

2006· article· en· W22214042 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
John Simmons

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsLatin AmericansHumanitiesGeographyEthnologyLibrary scienceHistoryPolitical scienceArtComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Natural history collections in Latin America are growing, and the rates of collection use are increasing. In response to the need for professional collections care train- ing in Latin America, we developed a comprehensive workshop to provide on-site training. The workshop uses a combination of lectures, readings, and hands-on activities to teach participants how to better manage collections and identify archivally sound materials. The workshop is structured around a conceptual model for teaching the theoretical bases of collections management that integrates preventive conservation with concepts of order and collection growth, and includes the history of collections, emphasis on the quality of the storage environment, and collection assessment. The workshops have identified several new areas for collections care research. The model can be successfully applied to other devel- oping regions outside of Latin America. Resumen.—Las colecciones de historia natural de America Latina estan creciendo, y la tasa de su uso tambien esta creciendo. Por lo tanto la necesidad de oportunidades para capacitacion profesional del cuidado de las colecciones en America Latina, desarrollamos un taller completo para proveer capacitacion en sitio. El taller es una combinacion de pre- sentaciones, lecturas, y actividades para ensenar a los participantes como manejar mejor las colecciones e identificar materiales archivables. El taller esta estructurado sobre un modelo conceptual para ensenar las bases teoreticas del manejo de colecciones que integra conser- vacion preventiva con los conceptos de orden y crecimiento de las colecciones, e incluye la historia de las colecciones, un enfasis en la cualidad del ambiente de almacenamiento, y la evaluacion de las colecciones. Los talleres han identificado algunas areas nuevas para la investigacion del cuidado de las colecciones. Nuestro modelo puede ser aplicado con e en las regiones en desarrollo fuera de America Latina.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.339
Threshold uncertainty score0.673

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0350.016
Scholarly communication0.0130.005
Open science0.0040.016
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpecies Distribution and Climate Change→French-language works237,207→